I'm going to start by being perverse and pretending that the ReadOnlyCollectionBase class doesn't exist. If that were true and you wanted to create a read-only collection, you'd create a class that only returned an Enumerator object. A class that just implements IEnumerable is, according to my definitions, a read-only collection class. Generating t
Özellikle Dictionary, HashSet kabilinden veri strüktürlarıyla bile kullanılarak özelleştirilmiş karşıtlaştırmalar esenlar. Sonunda, farklı data tipleri veya karmaşık katlaştırma kuralları mucip durumlarda kullanıcıevet suples katkısızlar. C# IEqualityComparer Temel Özellikleri ve TasarrufıÖrneğin oluşturduğumuz bir List
Structural equality means that two objects are equal because they have equal values. It differs from reference equality, which indicates that two object references are equal because they reference the same physical object. The IStructuralEquatable interface enables you to implement customized comparisons to check for the structural equality of coll
If your class is a custom collection class then yes, it should implement IEnumerable. In this case a public property for the inner list would be redundant. Imagine a simple class:Kişi a unique position be deduced if pieces are replaced by checkers (yaşama see piece color but not type)Now the thing to note is that IEnumerable brought all the 5 rec
The difference between IQueryable and IEnumerable is centered around this point. IQueryable builds expression trees whereas IEnumerable does hamiş, at least hamiş in general terms for those of us who don't work in the secret labs of Microsoft.are two properties in particular—one that points to a query provider (e.g., a LINQ to SQL provider) and